These FREE updates are supplemental information to the extensive
knowledge contained in the
Demand Studio
Secrets book.
Decision Format Change
September 1, 2010
Demand Studios is making a change to the Decision Format. It has always been about presenting two different view points then giving the reader the bottom line. However, many topics do not have strong counterpoints. In the past, DS has accepted Decision Format articles that had a strong argument for one course of action without much of an argument for another course of action because it is unlikely someone would choose that. They say they wont do that anymore.
If a Decision Format title does not have a strong point and counterpoint, it should not be accepted. It is not enough to say you could do one thing but you shouldn't do the other thing because that would be stupid. Any Decision Format article that does not present a balanced argument will be rejected. Avoid these titles.
If you have not purchased the 182 page book yet, you can do so at the link below. It encompasses every aspect of Demand Studios from applying to writing to consistently making big money. It costs just
$19.99, which is what you can easily make in less than an hour with Demand Studios.
Click Here to Purchase
UPDATE: August 30, 2010
New Publisher
Email went out today to Demand Studio business and finance writers announcing a new publisher called eHow Business and Personal Finance. The email says that only certain writers were selected for this "exclusive writing team" based on "high quality of work on eHow." They are trying to make writing for this new publisher exclusive. It is not.
EHow Business and Personal Finance is just another eHow topic guide.
See their page here. I used to manage three of these. They are a collection of articles on the same subject concentrated in one place. The issues are topical these days, but not exclusive. The selection of assignments is ordinary and there is no extra pay. There are most $15 How To formats with plenty of $7.50 Fact Sheet formats. Write for them if you like, but understand that there are no special incentives there.
UPDATE: August 27, 2010
Monthly Earnings Goal
After polling my readers, I have concluded that the new Monthly Earnings Goal is a popular new addition to the Demand Studios work desk. It is a bright, visual way to track progress and motivate toward an earnings goal. Bravo DS! Some writers questioned whether it needed to go all the way up to $5,000 per month. Absolutely. There are some Demand Studios writers making that much. It comes out to $60,000 per year. This is a feasible goal if you use the Demand Studio Secrets method.
UPDATE: August 25, 2010
Rejection Reminders Removed
Well, they must be listening to us over at Demand Studios. After years of lobbying, and discussion right here on the Demand Studio Secrets forum, DS has decided to finally get rid of the eternal rejection reminders. They will now only appear on your Work Desk for just 7 days instead of forever. We applaud the move while we ask. "what took so long?" I personally discussed the issue with DS back in September 2009. I know tech guys can be slow sometimes, but come on.
If you miss your rejected articles, you can click on a link called Show Older Rejected Articles. When you do, you are reunited with your old failures. Be careful if you do this. There is no link to get back to the rejection free Work Desk. You must reload the page. I wonder how long it will take to fix that?
UPDATE: August 24, 2010
Photo Requirement
UPDATE: August 23, 2010
Demand Studio Secrets, third edition
The third edition of Demand Studio Secrets is now available! It has expanded to 182 pages and is updated from cover to cover. There a more detailed revenue share section plus new chapters on health insurance, taxes, new writer probation, contests, photos, instant rejection, site glitches, new formats, and the future of Demand Studios. I also talk about using Demand Studios to help you finance travel around the world. I am currently writing a companion book on that subject that will be available in the fall.
Legacy status will be extended to anyone who purchases the third edition of Demand Studio Secrets through September 30, 2010. Those with legacy status are entitled to free updated editions of Demand Studio Secrets for life.
UPDATE: August 22, 2010
Is Demand Media In Financial Trouble?
Ever since Demand Media announced its initial public offering, it has been under attack by the mainstream media. They question Demand Media's claim that they are profitable. The mainstream media is ultra critical of Demand Media. After all, Demand Media's model is putting the mainstream media out of business. All their talk is stirring up doubt about the company.
Corporate finance is a complex thing. Money is moved around, they carry debt to keep things operating, and all sorts of things are shifted for tax purposes. No one really knows what is going on with a company until they pay dividends or someone is indicted. The bottom line is that I don't know what is really going on with Demand Media's finances, and the so-called experts don't know either.
Here is what I know: Demand Studios has never failed to pay writers in their history. They took it upon themselves to pay twice a week even though no one was complaining that they paid once per week. They continue to increase the number of assignments available while increasing pay.
Are they in financial trouble? I don't know and I don't really care. Anybody working for any company could have an employer in financial trouble. As long as they get paid, who cares? Demand Media and Demand Studios offer a no strings attached arrangement. Do some work and they give you money. As long as this continues, there are no problems.
UPDATE: August 20, 2010
Demand Studio Secrets, Third Edition
Demand Studios is constantly changing. Over the past few months we have witnessed some of the most profound changes in its history. Demand Studio Secrets is adapting right along with DS. I am in the process of writing a third edition of Demand Studio Secrets. This is essentially a complete rewrite of the book. Every section contains updates and it will contain all sorts of new stuff. There is
UPDATE: August 18, 2010
Demand Studio Secrets Forum
The new Demand Studio Secrets forum is a huge success. Writers are welcoming it as a much needed outlet for alternative views and questions regarding Demand Studios that wont be heard on the company forum. It is completely anonymous, so there is no fear of repercussions. You can ask any question you want and get candid answers. Check it out on at this link:
Demand Studio Secrets forum. You can also click the "forum" navigation link on the left of this page in the blue box.
UPDATE: August 11, 2010
NEW Rejection Appeal Process
In response to overwhelming demand from this website and others, Demand Studios is finally overhauling their poorly designed rejection appeal process. Before you get too excited, let me tell you how it works. It will be like asking for an instant replay review in professional football. You will have two "flags" that you can throw to appeal a rejection. If you win your appeal, you will not be charged an appeal credit. If you lose, they take it. You get an additional appeal credit for every 20 articles you get approved, but if you use them up before earning more, you are out of luck. The best part about the new process is that you no longer need to fill out forms and send email to appeal. You can just click a button next to your rejection on your work desk within 7 days of your rejection.
They have come up with a very interesting system. I am conflicted. On one hand, it is commendable that DS is making an effort to address the horrendous unfair rejection issue. It alienates writers and reduces morale. Writers feel like they have no voice and that they are oppressed by faceless copy editors who arbitrarily hand out rejections and rewrites. This new process is a simple way for writers to stand up for themselves and save their work without consuming too much time.
On the other hand, this makes the whole process seem like a game. One month you might get no unfair rejections. Another month you might get five. The process should be about need, not limits. I understand that they must curb chronic appealers, but I think a better way to do that would be to just warn and penalize abusers of the system. It is like their system for flagging bad titles. They ask you to volunteer your own time to alert them to bad titles, then threaten to punish you if they don't agree with your selections. It doesn't make a lot of sense. The appeal credit system will make writers hesitant to use them for fear that they might need the appeals later. Maybe that's the point. Giving writers this tool makes DS look like they care, but will actually just reduce their appeal workload. They can guarantee that no writer can complain more than a few times per month. It is brilliant.
UPDATE: August 10, 2010
NEW Demand Studio Secrets Forum
I have created a
new forum on the DemandStudioSecrets.com website. It is a place where writers can make comments, ask questions and level criticism that they don’t necessarily want on the Demand Studios forum. It is completely anonymous. Just make up a username that differs from your Demand Studios username. If you need help, advice or just want to vent, please feel free to utilize the forum on DemandStudioSecrets.com. I promise not to pull any punches.
To visit the forum click the link in the blue box on the left of this page.
UPDATE: August 9, 2010
Demand Media Goes Public
Demand Media is preparing to go public, offering stock for sale. This promises to be one of the biggest IPOs in years.
Demand Media had revenues of $114 million in the first half of 2010, up from $91.3 million for the same period in 2009. They also cut their debt in half. The company is in solid shape and is growing fast. I've been asked if I plan to invest. I preface the answer by saying there is no question that Demand Media is positioned to go huge. The infusion of cash that an IPO offers will allow them to go after some big time acquisitions and play with the big boys like Google and Microsoft. They could soon become another giant or could get gobbled up by a bigger giant. Either way, the stock price promises to rise. However, all IPOs are about hype. The more buzz you generate about a new stock, the higher it gets bid up on the day of release. This makes the company owners very, very rich instantaneously. The stock price inevitably adjusts to reasonable levels over the following months. In my opinion, Demand Media is an excellent long term investment. However, trying to buy stock on the day of release would be foolish since you will never get the preferred price enjoyed by insiders. Keep an eye on the stock price, then leap on it when the price bottoms out. See and hear co-founder Shawn Colo and Steven Kydd, executive VP of Demand Studios, talk about it by
clicking this link.
UPDATE: August 7, 2010
New Publishers
As I consistently remind readers of this website, Demand Studios is the future of media content. While the traditional media of television news, newspapers and magazines whither and die before our eyes, Demand Studios flourishes. Take a look at the latest two publishers doing business with Demand Studios. They are SFGate.com, the online version of the San Francisco Chronical, and Chron.com, the online version of the Houston Chronicle. These A-list media websites now use the Demand Studios content you create. The old media model of in-house content production no longer works. It is too expensive and revenues are no longer there as audiences abandon traditional media for the Internet. Publications are forced to increase their online presence if they are to survive. Instead of maintaining their own newsrooms, they are farming out the work to Demand Studios. As a 22 year veteran of the traditional news media, I can tell you that everyone in the traditional media sees the specter of death hanging over their newsrooms. That is why I got out of the traditional media and into this. Demand Studios is the future and will only get stronger as it feeds on the remains of traditional media. Be happy you are a part of the new era and strive to be on the crest of the swelling wave. Pay close attention to my chapters on Getting Promoted within Demand Studios. There are many more opportunities than simply writing freelance articles. You will be in a position to piggy back on Demand Media's success.
UPDATE: August 4, 2010
Demand Media Studios
Demand Studios is now re-branded as Demand Media Studios. What does this mean? Absolutely nothing. Demand Media is the parent company of Demand Studios. DS is the wildly successful content creation division of the company. Since it is getting so much attention, Demand Media is making an effort to direct more of that attention to the entire company. Besides the new logo, you probably wont notice any difference. The website will not change and people will still call it Demand Studios. I mean, Demand Media Studios just doesn't roll off the tongue. I will continue to abbreviate it DS, not DMS. That extra key stroke cuts into my P/T Ratio.
UPDATE: August 1, 2010
Format Changes
Demand Studio has a new format for LiveStrong writers called Lifestyle Product Descriptions. This is similar to other consumer oriented formats like Travel Review and Product Review with a few notable differences. Even though the forum post announcing this new format calls it a "review," it is not actually critiquing the product. It is strictly a description of the product pulled from a variety of sources that can be seen in a single article. The viewpoint is supposed to be neutral. Unlike other formats, you are allowed to use commercial sites for reference, even if it is not the manufacturer. They don't encourage in-text citations unless they refer to studies or expert opinion. DS wants them written in the second person. They want a lot of "you can do this" and "you will find that" in the article. Writers will find this format strictly grunt work. There is no creativity, just the simple gathering of facts and summarizing. On the other hand, the format is straight forward so you shouldn't get many rewrites.
Another recent format change affects the Fact Sheet format. You are now only required to write three sections instead of five. I did not write about it earlier since this change is insignificant. A Fact Sheet is a miniature About format requiring only 150 to 200 words. Since each section is no more than two to three sentences, you will probably write at least five sections anyway. Still, it is nice to see DS loosening up their formats. There is nothing worse than forcing yourself to write more because of a format requirement.
UPDATE: July 30, 2010
Rewrite Dilemma
I am being inundated with email from
Demand Studio Secrets readers complaining about increased rewrites and rejections from copy editors who seem to be unnecessarily harsh. I first wrote about this back on May 3. (see
archive 1) One writer had an article that called for a "remedy" to a dog disease. It was sent back for a rewrite with the following comment from the CE:
"Some good information here--but, when I read "remedy" I think of a home remedy--such as the homeopathic remedy
you allude to in your tip. Your article, essentially, says take the dog
to the vet--and the vet will perform the following tests. In my mind,
this does not answer the title. I've queried my lead to be sure. (Maybe a
vet is the only way, but then you really would have needed to contact
titling to get them to change the title)".
Apparently there is no home remedy to the disease and you can kill your dog if you don't take them to the vet. The writer sent an email to Joey Campbell informing him of this and suggesting that the title be changed to make the article more accurate. She never heard back from Joey Campbell. Instead, Content Curator Richard Lally wrote her saying:
"As you realized, taking a dog to the vet is not a remedy. If there are
no remedies for this, you should have reported the title as
unfulfillable, as company policy dictates.
I'm sorry you've
invested time in this, but the rules require you to send this back to
the editor for a rejection/deletion. You may not let it expire.
Please
flag or report any "bad" titles you encounter in the future. If you're
unsure whether a title can be fulfilled, contact the Title Clarification
Forum before writing anything.
Regards,
Richard Lally
Content Curator
"
There are several issues here. The writer is in an impossible spot. Work and time is already investing in writing the article and now DS is saying more work and time must be invested since the rewrite cannot be abandoned. This is a contradiction since they are also saying the title is impossible to write. This goes back to the title issue I often criticize. Demand Studios should not be offering bad titles that are impossible to write. The titles are computer generated, but they are also screened by title editors. If a bad one slips through, DS should stand by it instead of hanging writers out to dry when they do the work in good faith. Their policy is generated a lot of bad will in the DS writing community.
That being said, it is important for writers to understand that they must work within the constraints of the DS system. DS may address this issue someday. Until then we must adapt to its limits. Also understand that DS does not change titles to accommodate writers. The titles are worded specifically to generate page views and revenue.
In Demand Studio Secrets I recommend only accepting titles that are clear and concise. Any title open to interpretation, inaccurate or impossible to write in less than 600 words should be avoided. This title never should have been accepted. I do not understand why Lally says rewrites cannot be abandoned. They are abandoned all the time. In fact, there is a counter for them on the Scorecard. You should not abandon too many of them since that could get you fired, but putting more work into a rewrite you know will be rejected makes no sense. This writers should also not have wasted time appealing the rewrite. There was no way the writer was going to win and another article could have been written in the time it took to appeal.
The key is to follow the guidelines in the Demand Studio Secrets book and keeping your P/T Ratio high at all costs. Wasting your time on efforts to save a lost cause will only lead to frustration and lost revenue.
UPDATE: July 28, 2010
Plagiarism and Content
One of my concerned readers wrote me concerned about a passage in the new Demand Studios Editorial Guidelines. It reads:
"Demand
Studios requires all articles to be unique and original. We have a
zero-tolerance for plagiarizing the work of others or repurposing
(duplicating) your own content. You may quote from other sources, but
only if you accompany the quoted material with an attribution. It’s
never acceptable to plagiarize the work of another writer. Every
article you submit must be original unto itself. Our in-house editors
conduct reviews of each writer’s accepted articles. If we find that
you’ve claimed similar titles and submitted the same or similar
content—or chunks of content—for any of these articles, you could
permanently lose your Studio privileges. We advise writers to avoid
choosing similar titles, as it's difficult to provide fresh content for
each title, and the penalty for repurposing content is so severe."
Let me be clear. You should never plagiarize anyone's work including your own. Once you sell an article to DS, it belongs to them. However, DS is being ridiculous and hypocritical if they are suggesting that you should never select a similar title. For example, it is to the benefit for DS for a doctor specializing in back ailments to write as many articles as possible about back pain cures. Tell the doctor to write about car repair because they wrote too many back articles is ludicrous. We all have our areas of expertise and should be encouraged to write on those areas. DS cranks out countless redundant titles. If they don't want similar articles they shouldn't offer redundant titles. They claim to like writers who produce high quality and quantity. It is impossible to write several thousand articles for Demand Studios without claiming some similar titles.
What DS is doing here is warning writers
not to plagiarize themselves. Cutting and pasting entire passages from one article to another is plagiarism. They call it "repurposing." Demand Studio Secrets shows writers how to write fresh articles from familiar material. Information is information and facts are facts. There is nothing unethical or improper with using similar
info to write multiple articles as long as the writing is different and it answers the specific title. Plagiarism is the copying of text.
Don't do that.
UPDATE: July 21, 2010
Book Review
Hundreds of writers are benefiting from the knowledge contained in the Demand Studio Secrets eBook. You can read testimonials from some of these writers on the
home page of this website.
Many independent sites are also posting reviews of the Demand Studio Secrets book. One we recently came across is on CashCampfire.com. They are in the middle of a "Demand Studios Work Challenge" and decided to test the information in the Demand Studio Secrets book. Here is an excerpt:
"The eBook consists of 138 pages and is surprisingly well written.
Basically, Kent shares his story on how to make pretty good, often
full-time, income with Demand Studios. I’ve found the whole book useful,
though one of the most astounding things I picked up from the eBook was
that you can actually get promoted on Demand Studios. Kent shares how
he is often asked to participate in special projects for Demand Studios,
has access to assignments that pay $100 per project, has an increased
assignment limit of over 50, is asked on many occasions to attend
special Demand Studios events, and how to become as successful as he is
by making Demand Studios a full-time career. After finishing the entire
book, my mind started doing cartwheels just thinking about what could be
achieved, whereas I would have had no idea it was possible to achieve
so much if I hadn’t read this eBook."
You can read the entire review by
clicking here.
Many of you have asked what Demand Studios thinks of the Demand Studio Secrets eBook. They officially have no comment. My contacts at Demand Studios say they know that all the information in the book is factual and does not harm the company in any way. In fact, it helps DS by making their writers more efficient and productive. They might resent that the book reveals some of the DS loopholes and that I call them out in the Free Updates section when they make a blunder. However, they have made no attempts to stop the distribution of the information in the Demand Studio Secrets book. I also continue to work with them, so they can't be too upset.

UPDATE: July 14, 2010
Working and Traveling
As I write this, I sit is a charming street side cafe in Paris sipping an overprice latte gazing at impossibly beautiful people walk by. It is Bastille Day in France, so the atmosphere is electric with anticipation of the night's festivities. Right now I am working, but it sure doesn't feel like work.
I tell you this to point out how writing for Demand Studios can actually change your life. Since your office is your computer, you can take your work just about anywhere in the world. I have traveled to more than 100 countries around the world. Some of them very remote. In the past five years, I have always been able to find Internet access. Free Wifi is available almost everywhere.
If you apply the method outlined in the
Demand Studio Secrets book, you can do whatever you want, go wherever you want, and set your own schedule. You can finance your travels as you go. Many of you are asking for more information on how to specifically use Demand Studios to finance a trip around the world. I am currently working on another book on just that. It will contain tips on equipment, locating Internet access, working offline, data dumping, and other unique issues you need to beware of when you work while traveling. I will keep you informed.
UPDATE: July 3, 2010
LiveStrong Contest Falls Short
The two month LiveStrong contest ordeal is over and Demand Studios wants you to know that you failed, but they still love you. If you recall, DS offered a $30,000 bonus to be distributed among 1,000 LS writers if they got 30,000 articles approved in May. When this didn't happen, they offered a $55,000 bonus for 55,000 articles in May and June. They ended up with 46,000 articles.
If you regularly read this update column then you know that I was cynical about the contest from the start. Do the math and you find that the bonus would have been $1 for each article written. You also have virtually no control over the result since 999 other writers also need to write the requisite number of articles.
Demand Studios is throwing the writers a bone. They are distributing half the reward to qualified writers. That comes to $27,500, which is about $27.50 per qualified writer. It might be less depending on how many qualified.
There are two ways you can view this:
- Demand Studios is being really cool by paying something even though the goal was not met.
- This was an evil plot by Demand Studios to squeeze more work out of writers even though they knew they wouldn't reach the lofty goal.
You can decide which you think is true. It is probably somewhere in the middle. The right thing to do would be to pay a proportionate amount of the reward. That would be a $46,000 reward instead of $27,500. That sounds fair, right?
UPDATE: July 1, 2010
Revenue Share Articles
I want to remind my readers not to neglect revenue share articles. They don't pay up front, but the income they generate can be significantly higher. The example I site in the
Demand Studio Secrets ebook continues to set new records for income. In the month of June 2010 alone it generated income of
$314.80. That puts the total income for its first year at
$2,090.89! Here are the screen captures to prove it:

The article took just 30 minutes to write yet it will continue generating income for many years. The monthly earnings have steadily risen throughout the year. Once you get a few articles like this working for you, you can work a lot less or even retire.
Pay close attention to the chapters on Revenue Share Strategy in the Demand Studio Secrets ebook. They detail how to identify profitable revenue share titles and how to make them pay. If you haven't bought the book yet, you can
purchase it here.
UPDATE: June 28, 2010
Demand Studio Site Glitches
I am being inundated with questions about the recent Demand Studios site glitches. The site would not store new material and erased previously saved material. This created havoc among writers and copy editors for several days. DS heroically recovered much of the lost data, but some never came back. Everyone lost money and wasted time throughout the ordeal.
Site glitches are somewhat common. They typically last a few minutes then solve themselves on their own without loss of data. The massive failure of the last few days was rare but not unheard of. A few years ago, DS gave every writer $15 for their inconvenience from a site glitch that lasted days. I doubt that would ever happen again since they have many more writers now.
Follow this procedure the next time there is a site glitch:
- Don't freak out. Accept glitches as part of life and don't waste energy being angry.
- Back up all your material. You should be doing this anyway, but it is especially important to do the first time you experience the glitch.
- Do not attempt to re-save the article. This could erase everything you previously entered. Much of the data lost from this most recent glitch was caused by re-saving.
- Go to the DS forums. If there is a site glitch, writers will chat about it in the forums. If nobody is chatting about it, post a question yourself. If there is no response in a few minutes then it is not a site-wide issue. It is just you. Check your computer and Internet connection.
- Don't waste your time complaining. DS is very good at keeping their site up and running. They probably already know about the problem and are working hard to fix it. Bugging them with complaints only slows them down and wastes your time. Remember that the theme of the Demand Studio Secrets book is the efficient use of your time.
- Go do something else. Consider the glitch an unscheduled break. Do not attempt to submit anything else until a message is posted on your Work Desk saying the problem is resolved. This will usually happen within a few hours.
- Don't worry about deadlines. Whenever a glitch takes the site down for a significant period of time, DS extends deadlines.
UPDATE: June 24, 2010
No New Writers?
I am hearing reports of applicants getting emails saying that Demand Studios is not accepting any more writers right now. My contacts at DS say this is a temporary situation that has more to do with their ability to handle the overwhelming number of applications than their need for new writers. As DS drives to expand to take over the world, they need more writers to churn out new content. It should not be long before they are accepting applications again. If you were denied, keep trying.
UPDATE: June 20, 2010
Bad Titles
Many of my readers are asking questions about writing bad titles. These are titles asking bad questions that cannot be directly answered. For example,
one of my readers wrote an article on a title about federal grants for women-owned businesses. She explained that there are no federal grants like this but state loans can be used instead. This is valuable information that a reader could use, but the copy editor told her that it would be rejected even with a rewrite.
This is unfair to the writer. It is not her fault that a bad title was on the list. She wrote the article in good faith only to be told that she would not be paid no matter what she did. Demand Studios should step up and provide some sort of compensation in situations like this. Perhaps they could pay half and give the writer credit for a written article. If DS puts out a bad title, they should take responsibility for it.
This is a tough situation. There is value
in bad titles since people search for bad titles all the time. It is
important to inform them that their search is in error. However, many DS CEs don't see it that way.
I write extensively about this in the
Demand Studio Secrets book. I
recommend avoiding controversial titles. A CE
could put it through or reject it altogether. You have not control but
suffer all the consequences. It is not your fault the title is bad yet
you are being punished. It is not fair. Just avoid bad titles so you don't have to deal with this.
UPDATE: June 10, 2010
Rejection Appeals
My contacts within Demand Studios say that they are being inundated with rejection appeals. Giving writers a way to fight back against rejections that they believe are unjust is opening the floodgates. Demand Studios did not expect this. Handling rejection appeals takes time and eats up man hours that are better spent elsewhere. The bottom line is that the process is costing DS money.
They posted the following on the site:
"Due to an overwhelming volume of rejection appeals, we are currently
behind in our response times. We will review all appeals we receive, so
please be patient and do not send in further queries regarding the
status of your appeals."
One way DS is attempting to streamline the process is by separating the appeals for rewrites and rejections. They hope that will help the process move faster since the requirements for each are different.
I want to reiterate what I advocate in the Demand Studio Secrets book. The process of appeal is a waste of time. If DS rejects your article, you still own the content. You can submit it again under another title. DS has hundreds of thousands of titles, many of them are virtually identical. One copy editor may hate your content but another might think it is fine. Appealing costs you money by using up time better spent earning. Most of the time appeals are rejected anyway. Put your ego aside and realize that the process is not personal. Move on.
UPDATE: May 28, 2010
Bonus Failure
Demand Studios conceded today that they will not pay out the $30,000 bonus to writers that they hoped to at the end of May. As we wrote about here back on May 4, DS promised to pay out a $30,000 bonus to LiveStrong writers if at least 1,000 of them wrote at least 30 LiveStrong articles each in May. DS now admits that they will not reach that goal and the $30,000 bonus will not be paid despite the writer's efforts. In an effort to continue dangling a carrot in front of writers, they simultaneously announced a new $55,000 bonus challenge to be paid only if LiveStrong writers produce 55,000 LiveStrong articles in May and June.
There are two ways you can look at this. Demand Studios could be extending the offer in a good faith effort to eventually pay it out and reward hard work. On the other hand, it could be an effort to squeeze a lot more work out of a bunch of suckers who will end up getting nothing for their dedication.
As I mentioned in my May 4 article, the bonus would only amount to about $1 per article. Ask yourself if it is worth your time and effort to change your establish writing habits for the potential for a $1 per article bonus that might never materialize.
STILL EMBARRASSING
Back on May 4, when DS first announced the bonus program, the email contained a huge error that any copy editor should have caught. They said it was for the month of June instead of May. Today's email contained the following sentence:
"Since so many writers worked so hard in May, we don't those
writers to lose out."
Any copy editor should notice that the word "want" is left out. This reiterates the point we made back on May 4 that anyone can make a mistake. Considering how heavy handed DS can be about errors in copy, you would think that they would read over their bulk emails before sending them out to the very people they constantly chastise to proofread.
UPDATE: May 20, 2010
New Publishers
Demand Studios is taking on two more newspaper clients and is looking for writers to create content for them. The clients are the San Francisco Chronicle and the Houston Chronicle. Let's clear up a few things first. You wont actually be writing for the ink and paper newspaper. Articles for the San Francisco Chronicle would appear in the real estate section of SFGate.com and articles for the Houston Chronicle would appear in the small business section of Chron.com. This is similar to what Demand Studios did with USA Today. Content they create appears in the travel section of USAToday.com.
Demand Studios promises to pay more for these articles. This is great but it may not be enough of an increase to justify the additional effort. I was part of the experiment to bring USA Today into the DS fold. The DS editors work very hard to impress USA Today so they will commit to the partnership. As a result, their articles are held to a much higher standard. The formats and topics are similar to what you would expect from DS, but copy editors send nearly every article back for rewrites for petty stuff that would not be asked for with any other publisher. Spending so much time on consistent rewrites lowers your P/T Ratio and costs you money. (See the P/T Ratio chapter of the Demand Studios Secrets book) It is also frustrating and lowers your ratings. This can cost you promotions in the long run. Expect the same kinds of heightened standards from these publishers.
UPDATE: May 18, 2010
Best Feature Ever
Demand Studios is implementing a new "hide" feature in the assignment list. This tiny button has the potential to save DS writers hours of time over the course of a year. When you see a title that you know you would never write, you can click the "hide" button next to the title and it will never appear in your assignment list again. This is extremely useful if you search for specific subjects consistently. If you hide the titles you don't want to write, you wont have to go through them again the next time you search for that topic. The problem with Demand Studios assignments is that there are too many. Hours of time are wasted scrolling through lists of unwanted titles. I highly recommend making ample use of the "hide" feature. Saved time means more money.